Chapelle — Paid Search
PPC Ecommerce

From a dormant account to doubling revenue year on year

Chapelle's Google Ads account had sat dormant since 2018 — live, but effectively unmanaged, because the team didn't have time to run it. Glass took it over in July 2024 and rebuilt it from the ground up. Within a year of active management it was doubling revenue year on year and capturing three times the search visibility.

+100% Revenue growth Year on year (May 2025 → May 2026)
+82% Conversions Same single-month comparison
+22% Return on ad spend More revenue per pound, not just more spend

A live account that had sat dormant since 2018

When Chapelle came to Glass Digital in July 2024, their Google Ads account had been dormant since 2018 — six years sitting idle, doing nothing. The reason was a common one: the in-house team simply didn’t have the time or dedicated resource to run paid search alongside everything else, so the account had been left switched off rather than working for the business.

So while the account existed on paper, in practice this was close to a from-scratch build. Presence was minimal — at our first full reporting snapshot the account was capturing only around a fifth of the search impressions available to it, meaning it was effectively invisible for roughly four in five relevant searches. There was no active feed optimisation, the campaign structure was dated, and the account wasn’t using the automated bidding and Performance Max capabilities that competitors had adopted while it sat idle.

Jewellery and watches is a competitive, seasonal category — intense branded and generic competition, high-consideration purchases, and a pronounced Christmas peak that rewards accounts built to scale into demand. The brief was to grow Chapelle’s online presence, conversions and revenue essentially from scratch: build a modern, competitive paid search account and scale it into a genuine revenue driver.

Starting position
Dormant Account unmanaged since 2018
~20% Of available search impressions captured
Outdated Campaign structure and product feed
Minimal Presence in a competitive market

Issues identified

  • Account dormant since 2018 — no active management for around six years
  • Minimal search visibility — capturing only around a fifth of available impressions
  • No product feed optimisation, limiting Shopping competitiveness
  • Outdated campaign structure — not using Performance Max or modern automated bidding
  • No dedicated in-house resource to build and scale the account

Building a competitive paid search account from the ground up

With the account effectively starting from scratch, the priority was to build something modern and competitive rather than patch up what was already there. Three principles shaped the rebuild.

Research-led foundations. Before scaling any spend, we did the groundwork — researching search volume across Chapelle’s jewellery and watches range and mapping competitor activity to understand where the account could realistically compete. In parallel we rebuilt the product feed to improve search relevancy, so that when campaigns did scale, products were in a strong position to show for the right queries.

A phased, data-led route to Performance Max. Rather than launching straight into automation, we built standard Shopping and Search campaigns first and let them gather meaningful conversion data. Only once that foundation was in place did we introduce Performance Max to fully capitalise on Google’s AI — giving the automation the signal quality it needs to perform, rather than switching it on cold.

Protecting what works. As performance data accumulated, we concentrated budget on the categories delivering the strongest ROAS and conversion rates — protecting the best-performing areas of the account and making sure spend followed genuine return rather than being spread thin across the range.

How we did it

Pillar 01

Research-led foundations

The starting point was understanding the opportunity. We researched search volume across Chapelle's jewellery and watches range and analysed competitor activity to see where the account could realistically win. Alongside this, we rebuilt the product feed — the backbone of any Shopping and Performance Max activity — optimising product titles, product types and other attributes to improve relevancy so items would surface for the right searches. This foundational work meant that when we later scaled spend, it went into an account set up to compete rather than one still finding its feet.

Pillar 02

A phased route to Performance Max

With a dormant account and little recent data to work from, launching straight into automated campaign types would have starved them of the signals they rely on. Instead we took a phased approach: standard Shopping and Search campaigns first, running long enough to gather meaningful conversion data. Once that base was established, we introduced Performance Max to fully capitalise on Google's AI capabilities — now with enough quality data behind it to perform. That sequencing is a large part of why the account scaled efficiently rather than burning budget while the algorithms learned.

Pillar 03

Protecting the strongest categories

As the account matured and performance data built up, we shifted from building to optimising. We identified the categories delivering the strongest ROAS and conversion rates and protected them — allocating budget toward the areas proven to return rather than spreading spend evenly across the range. This disciplined, return-led budgeting is what kept efficiency climbing even as overall spend and revenue grew.

Starting from a dormant account, we rebuilt Chapelle's paid search into a genuine revenue driver — and the growth has kept compounding. A year into active management, the account was still doubling revenue year on year: comparing May 2026 with May 2025 on a like-for-like single-month basis, revenue is up 100% and conversions 82%. That growth came with improving efficiency, not at its expense — return on ad spend up around 22%, conversion rate up roughly 29%, and cost per acquisition down around 10% — so scale and quality moved together rather than trading off. Most tellingly for an account rebuilt from dormancy, its search impression share roughly tripled, from capturing around a fifth of the available market to close to three-fifths.

+100% Revenue Year on year (May 2025 → May 2026)
+82% Conversions Same single-month comparison
+22% Return on ad spend More revenue per pound spent
~3x Search impression share From ~20% to ~60% of available market (Jan 2025 → May 2026)

Revenue growth, month on month against last year

Year-on-year revenue growth by month (2026 vs 2025)

Period Value
Jan 55%
Feb 62%
Mar 101%
Apr 96%
May 100%

Monthly revenue for the first five months of 2026 compared like-for-like with the same months in 2025. Each bar is the year-on-year change. Growth built through the period, with March and May both roughly doubling year on year. Values are percentage change; absolute revenue is withheld as commercially sensitive.

Google Ads that could be working harder?

Whether you're capturing only a fraction of your available market, your conversion rate has plateaued, or you want to scale spend without watching efficiency slide, we'll review your Google Ads account and show you where the growth is. Free, no obligation.

Book my free PPC review